Target Committee, Los Alamos, May 10-11, 1945
Minutes of the second meeting of the
Target Committee
Los Alamos, May 10-11, 1945
Source: U.S. National Archives, Record Group 77, Records of the
Office of the Chief of Engineers, Manhattan Engineer District, TS
Manhattan Project File '42-'46, folder 5D Selection of Targets, 2 Notes on
Target Committee Meetings.
TOP SECRET TOP SECRET
Auth: C.O., Site Y, N.M.
Initials:
Date: 12 May 1945
This document consists of 7 Page(s)
No. 1 of 4 Copies, Series A
U-13-XIX-1A
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 11653, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (6)
NND 730039
By ERC NARS, Date 6-4-74
12 May 1945
Memorandum For: Major General L. R. Groves
Subject: Summary of Target Committee Meetings on 10 and 11 May 1945
1. The second meeting of the Target Committee convened at 9:00 AM 10
May in Dr. Oppenheimer's office at Site Y with the following present:
General Farrell Dr. C. Lauritsen
Colonel Seeman Dr. Ramsey
Captain Parsons Dr. Dennison
Major Derry Dr. von Neumann
Dr. Stearns Dr. Wilson
Dr. Tolman Dr. Penney
Dr. Oppenheimer
Dr. Bethe and Dr. Brode were brought into the meeting for discussion of
Item A of the agenda. During the course of the meeting panels were formed
from the committee members and others to meet in the afternoon and develop
conclusions to items discussed in the agenda. The concluding meeting was
held at 10:00 AM 11 May in Dr. Oppenheimer's office with the following
present:
Colonel Seeman Dr. Stearns
Captain Parsons Dr. Von Neumann
Major Derry Dr. Dennison
Dr. Tolman Dr. Penney
Dr. Oppenheimer Dr. Ramsey
Dr. Wilson
2. The agenda for the meetings presented by Dr. Oppenheimer consisted of
the following:
A. Height of Detonation
B: Report on Weather and Operations
C: Gadget Jettisoning and Landing
D: Status of Targets
E: Psychological Factors in Target Selection
F: Use Against Military Objectives
G: Radiological Effects
H: Coordinated Air Operations
I: Rehearsals
J: Operating Requirements for Safety of Airplanes
K: Coordination with 21st Program
3. Height of Detonation
A. The criteria for determining height selection were discussed. It was
agreed that conservative figures should be used in determining the height
since it is not possible to predict accurately the magnitude of the
explosion and since the bomb can be detonated as much as 40% below the
optimum with a reduction of 25% in area of damage whereas a detonation 14%
above the optimum will cause the same loss in area. It was agreed that
fuses should be prepared to meet the following possibilities:
(1) For the Little Boy the detonation heights should correspond to a
pressure of 5 psi, a height of the Mach-stem of 100 feet and a magnitude
of detonation of either 5,000 or 15,000 tons of H.E. equivalent. With
present knowledge the fuse setting corresponding to 5,000 tons
equivalent would be used but fusing for the other should be available in
case more is known at the time of delivery. The height of detonation
corresponding to 5,000 and 15,000 tons are 1550 feet and 2400 feet,
respectively.
(2) For the Fat Man the detonation heights should correspond to a
pressure of 5 psi, a height of the Mach-stem of 100 feet, and a
magnitude of explosion of 700, 2,000, or 5,000 tons of H.E. equivalent.
With the present information the fuse should be set at 2,000 tons
equivalent but fusing for the other values should be available at the
time of final delivery. The heights of detonation corresponding to 700,
2,000, and 5,000 tons are 580 feet, 1,000 feet and 1,550 feet,
respectively. Trinity data will be used for this gadget.
B. In the case of the Fat Man delay circuits are introduced into the
unit for purposes which make the detonation of the bomb 400 feet below the
height at which the fuse is set. For this reason as far as the Fat Man is
concerned the fuse settings should be 980 feet, 1,400 feet, or 1,950 feet.
C. In view of the above it was agreed by all present that fuses should
be available at four (4) different height settings. These heights are
1,000 feet, 1,400 feet, 2,000 feet and 2,400 feet. With present
information the 1,400 feet fuse would be most likely to be used for both
the Fat Man and the Little Boy. (Later data presented by Dr. Brode modify
the above conclusions on fusing and detonating heights; the differential
height for the Little Boy is 210 feet and for the Fat Man 500 feet. For
this reason some of the above figures must be revised).
4. Report on Weather and Operations
A. Dr. Dennison reported on the above subject. His report essentially
covered the materials in his Top Secret memo of 9 May - Subject:
"Preliminary report on Operational Procedures". For this reason his report
will not be repeated here but is attached as an appendix. It was agreed by
those present that the mission if at all possible should be a visual
bombing mission. For this we should be prepared to wait until there is a
good weather forecast in one or more of three alternative targets. There
is only a 2% chance in this case that we will have to wait over two weeks.
When the mission does take place there should be weather spotter aircraft
over each of three alternative targets in order that an alternative target
may be selected in the last hour of the flight if the weather is
unpromising over the highest priority target.
B. In case the aircraft reaches the target and finds, despite these
precautions that visual bombing is impossible, it should return to its
base provided that it is in good operating condition. Only if the aircraft
is in sufficiently bad shape that it is unlikely that it can return to
base and make a safe landing or if it is essential that the drop be made
that day should the drop be made with radar equipment. For this purpose it
may be desirable to have an Eagle radar equipped plane accompany the
mission in order that formation bombing with the Eagle plane in the lead
can be made to obtain the increased accuracy from Eagle. A final decision
as to the desirablity of this emergency procedure can only be made after
further combat experience is obtained with Eagle aircraft. In any case
every effort should be made to have the mission such that blind bombing
will be unnecessary.
C. It was agreed that Dr. Stearns and Dr. Dennison should keep
themselves continuously informed as to radar developments. If at any time
new developments are available which show in combat a marked improvement
of accuracy the basic plan may be altered.
D. It was agreed that Shoran was a very promising development for the
21st Bomber Command but that we should make no plans to use Shoran until
its success is fully confirmed in normal bombing missions in that area.
E. The plan to use the gadget with visual bombing even though this may
require a one day to three weeks delay requires that the gadget be such
that for a period of at least three weeks it can be held in readiness in
such a state that on twelve hours notice it can be prepared for a combat
mission. No difficulty in this regard was foreseen by those present.
5. Gadget Jettisoning and Landing
A. It was agreed that if the aircraft has to return to its base with
the gadget and if it is in good condition when it has reached there, it
should make a normal landing with the greatest possible care and with such
precautions as stand-by fire equipment being held in readiness on the
ground. This operation will inevitably involve some risks to the base and
to the other aircraft parked on the field. However, the chance of a crash
when the aircraft is in good condition and the chances of a crash
initiating a high order explosion are both sufficiently small that it was
the view of those present that the landing operation with the unit under
these circumstances was a justifiable risk. Frequent landings with inert
and H.E. filled units have been made in the past. Training in landing with
the unit should be given to all crews who carry an active unit.
B. In case the aircraft returns to its base and then finds that it
cannot make a normal landing it may be necessary to jettison the bomb. In
the case of the Fat Man this can probably best be accomplished by dropping
the bomb into shallow water from a low altitude. Tests on this will be
carried out with both inert and live units. In the case of the Little Boy
the situation is considerably more complicated since water leaking into
the Little boy will set off a nuclear reaction, and since the American
held territory in the vicinity of the base is so densely filled that no
suitable jettisoning ground for the Little Boy has been found which is
sufficiently devoid of moisture, which is sufficiently soft that the
projectile is sure not to seat from the impact, and which is sufficiently
remote from extremely important American installations whose damage by a
nuclear explosion would seriously affect the American war effort. The best
emergency procedure that has so far been proposed is considered to be the
removal of the gunpowder from the gun and the execution of a crash
landing. In this case there is no danger of fire setting off the gun and
the accelerations should be sufficiently small to prevent seating of the
projectile by the impact. Tests on the feasibility of unloading the gun
powder in flight will be conducted.
C. It was agreed that prior to actual delivery some form of
instructions should be prepared as a guide to the senior man on the
aircraft as to procedures to be followed in cases of different types of
disasters.
6. Status of Targets
A. Dr. Stearns described the work he had done on target selection. He
has surveyed possible targets possessing the following qualification: (1)
they be important targets in a large urban area of more than three miles
in diameter, (2) they be capable of being damaged effectively by a blast,
and (3) they are unlikely to be attacked by next August. Dr. Stearns had a
list of five targets which the Air Force would be willing to reserve for
our use unless unforeseen circumstances arise. These targets are:
(1) Kyoto - This target is an urban industrial area with a
population of 1,000,000. It is the former capital of Japan and many
people and industries are now being moved there as other areas are being
destroyed. From the psychological point of view there is the advantage
that Kyoto is an intellectual center for Japan and the people there are
more apt to appreciate the significance of such a weapon as the gadget.
(Classified as an AA Target)
(2) Hiroshima - This is an important army depot and port of
embarkation in the middle of an urban industrial area. It is a good
radar target and it is such a size that a large part of the city could
be extensively damaged. There are adjacent hills which are likely to
produce a focussing effect which would considerably increase the blast
damage. Due to rivers it is not a good incendiary target. (Classified as
an AA Target)
(3) Yokohama - This target is an important urban industrial
area which has so far been untouched. Industrial activities include
aircraft manufacture, machine tools, docks, electrical equipment and oil
refineries. As the damage to Tokyo has increased additional industries
have moved to Yokohama. It has the disadvantage of the most important
target areas being separated by a large body of water and of being in
the heaviest anti-aircraft concentration in Japan. For us it has the
advantage as an alternate target for use in case of bad weather of being
rather far removed from the other targets considered. (Classified as an
A Target)
(4) Kokura Arsenal - This is one of the largest arsenals in
Japan and is surrounded by urban industrial structures. The arsenal is
important for light ordnance, anti-aircraft and beach head defense
materials. The dimensions of the arsenal are 4100' x 2000'. The
dimensions are such that if the bomb were properly placed full advantage
could be taken of the higher pressures immediately underneath the bomb
for destroying the more solid structures and at the same time
considerable blast damage could be done to more feeble structures
further away. (Classified as an A Target)
(5) Niigata - This is a port of embarkation on the N.W. coast
of Honshu. Its importance is increasing as other ports are damaged.
Machine tool industries are located there and it is a potential center
for industrial despersion. It has oil refineries and storage.
(Classified as a B Target)
(6) The possibility of bombing the Emperor's palace was discussed. It
was agreed that we should not recommend it but that any action for this
bombing should come from authorities on military policy. It was agreed
that we should obtain information from which we could determine the
effectiveness of our weapon against this target.
B. It was the recommendation of those present at the meeting that the
first four choices of targets for our weapon should be the following:
a. Kyoto
b. Hiroshima
c. Yokohama
d. Kokura Arsenal
C. Dr. Stearns agreed to do the following: (1) brief Colonel Fisher
thoroughly on these matters, (2) request reservations for these targets,
(3) find out more about the target area including exact locations of the
strategic industries there, (4) obtain further photo information on the
targets, and (5) to determine the nature of the construction, the area,
heights, contents and roof coverage of buildings. He also agreed to keep
in touch with the target data as it develops and to keep the committee
advised of other possible target areas. He will also check on locations of
small military targets and obtain further details on the Emperor's palace.
7. Psychological Factors in Target Selection
A. It was agreed that psychological factors in the target selection
were of great importance. Two aspects of this are (1) obtaining the
greatest psychological effect against Japan and (2) making the initial use
sufficiently spectacular for the importance of the weapon to be
internationally recognized when publicity on it is released.
B. In this respect Kyoto has the advantage of the people being more
highly intelligent and hence better able to appreciate the significance of
the weapon. Hiroshima has the advantage of being such a size and with
possible focussing from nearby mountains that a large fraction of the city
may be destroyed. The Emperor's palace in Tokyo has a greater fame than
any other target but is of least strategic value.
8. Use Against "Military" Objectives
A. It was agreed that for the initial use of the weapon any small and
strictly military objective should be located in a much larger area
subject to blast damage in order to avoid undue risks of the weapon being
lost due to bad placing of the bomb.
9. Radiological Effect
A. Dr. Oppenheimer presented a memo he had prepared on the radiological
effects of the gadget. This memo will not be repeated in this summary but
it is being sent to General Groves as a separate exhibit. The basic
recommendations of this memo are (1) for radiological reasons no aircraft
should be closer than 2-1/2 miles to the point of detonation (for blast
reasons the distance should be greater) and (2) aircraft must avoid the
cloud of radio-active materials. If other aircraft are to conduct missions
shortly after the detonation a monitoring plane should determine the areas
to be avoided.
10. Coordinated Air Operations
A. The feasibility of following the raid by an incendiary mission was
discussed. This has the great advantage that the enemies' fire fighting
ability will probably be paralyzed by the gadget so that a very serious
conflagration should be capable of being started. However, until more is
learned about the phenomena associated with a detonation of the gadget,
such as the extent to which there will be radio-active clouds, an
incendiary mission immediately after the delivery of the gadget should be
avoided. A coordinated incendiary raid should be feasible on the following
day at which time the fire raid should still be quite effective. By
delaying the coordinated raid to the following day, the scheduling of our
already contemplated operations will not be made even more difficult,
photo reconnaissance of the actual damage directly caused by our device
can be obtained without confusion from the subsequent fire raid, and
dangers from radio-active clouds can be avoided.
B. Fighter cover should be used for the operation as directed by the
21st Bomber Command.
11. Rehearsals
A. It was agreed by all that very complete rehearsals of the entire
operation are essential to its success. It is possible for thirty (30)
pumpkin units for this purpose to be shipped from this country in June
with perhaps sixty (60) being shipped in July. These rehearsals overseas
should take place beginning in July. At least some of the rehearsals
should be very complete including the placing of spotter aircraft over the
alternative targets, use of fighter cover, etc. Even though it is hoped
that radar will not be used some rehearsals of radar operations are
required in order that the operations may be carried out successfully if
emergency arises for which they are required.
12. Operating Requirements for Safety of Aircraft
A. Dr. Penney reported some very encouraging information he had just
received from England in this respect. His previous information was that
no one could guarantee the safety of a large aircraft at blast pressures
greater than 1/2 lb. per square inch. However, in some recent experiments
in England large aircraft have been flown over detonations of 2,000 lbs.
of TNT and pilots have not objected to going as low as 900 feet. On this
basis with a 100,000 ton total equivalent energy release or a 64,000 ton
equivalent blast energy 23,000 feet would be a safe altitude on the basis
of these experiments if allowance is made for the rarefaction of the
atmosphere at high altitudes. However, due to the greater duration of the
blast in our case, the safe height will probably be somewhat greater.
13. Coordination with 21st Program
A. This matter was included as part of the other discussion and is
included in previous paragraphs of this summary.
14. It was agreed that the next meeting of the Target Committee should
take place at 9:00 AM EWT on 28 May in Room 4E200 of the Pentagon Building
in Washington. Dr. Oppenheimer recommended and others agreed that either
Captain Parsons and/or Dr. Ramsey should attend this meeting.
15. In view of the high classification of the minutes of this meeting
it was agreed that copies should not be sent to those present but that
instead one copy should be kept on file in General Groves' office, one
copy in Dr. Oppenheimer's office, and one copy in Captain Parson's office.
[signature]
[signature]
Major J. A. Derry
Dr. N. F. Ramsey
dc
Distribution:
Copy 1: Maj Gen L. R. Groves
Copy 2: Capt. Parsons
Copies 3 & 4: J. R. Oppenheimer
|